Balaram Paikaray v. State of Orissa
Case brief
What is this about?
Learned Additional Standing Counsel on…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
ABLAPL No. 20725 of 2017
03 04.12.2018 Learned Additional Standing Counsel on instructions states that no FIR has been lodged against the petitioner.
Perused the record. It appears that the petitioner has filed this application without incorporating the copy of the F.I.R. From this it is evident that on mere apprehension the petitioner has filed this bail application. Therefore, this Court is not inclined to entertain this application. However, if any F.I.R. lodges against the petitioner, he is at liberty to approach the appropriate forum in accordance with law.
Accordingly, the ABLAPL stands disposed of.
Interim order granted on 10.01.2018 stands vacated.
(Dr. B.R. SARANGI, J)
Alok
Dr. B.R. Sarangi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court