Dismissed
Sekhar Ku.Yadav v. State
Orissa HCWP(C)/5272/2010
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
The Court held that the writ petition became infructuous by efflux of time and dismissed it.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
W.P.(C) No. 5272 of 2010
¶2
02. 01.03.2017 Learned counsel for the petitioner states that by efflux of ti
me, this writ petition has become infructuous.
¶3
The writ petition is accordingly dismissed as infructuous.
¶4
.......
( VINEET SARAN )
CHIEF JUSTICE
¶5
( DR. B.R. SARANGI )
¶6
JUDGE
¶7
dm
¶8
-2-
Coram
AI extract
VINEET SARAN
DR. B.R. SARANGI
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court