Petitioner also challenges the consequential orders under Annexures-4 & 10.
Reading of the order under Annexure-4 gives a clear indication of total demand. From A
nnexure-10, it appears, the matter has been taken up for execution of the demand indicated in
Annexures-3 & 4. The interest due against the petitioner is to the tune of Rs.28,58,100/- as c
learly borne form the page 57 of the brief.
Learned counsel for the petitioner without prejudicing to his objection to the claim m
ade by the opposite parties involving Annexures-3, 4 & 10 makes a statement that as he has alr
eady deposited a sum of Rs.10,00,000/- in two installments pursuant to the direction of this C
ourt dated 7.10.2002 and also deposited a further sum of Rs.12,50,000/- pursuant to the direct
ion of this Court dated 19.1.2006, he has no hesitation to deposit the balance amount of rupee
s six lakhs and odd provided the petitioner is granted some more time to deposit the same and
further, the deposit will also be subject to the result of the objection to be raised by the p
etitioner on the claim of the opposite parties involving Annexures-3, 4 & 10.
Considering the contentions of the parties and looking to the objection in the writ pe
tition, this Court finds, ultimately a decision on the objection of the petitioner is required
to be taken by the E.S.I Corporation. Petitioner is permitted to raise his objection within a
period of three weeks.
