B.v.v.S.Vizaya Kumar v. State
Case brief
What is this about?
No.14347 of 2004 4. 02.08.2017 Heard learned…
What did the court decide?
Petitioner directed to file Form-II within three weeks; proceedings to be decided considering Form-II.
No.14347 of 2004 4. 02.08.2017 Heard learned…
Petitioner directed to file Form-II within three weeks; proceedings to be decided considering Form-II.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
W.P.(C). No.14347 of 2004
4. 02.08.2017 Heard learned counsel appearing for the respective part
ies.
For the decision of this Court in the case of Jhadeswar Rajak v. State of Ori
ssa & Others, 2014(I) OLR 454, the question challenging the vires of Section 3(B) (1) and (2
) of Orissa Regulation 1 of 2002 does not survive.
As provided in the above decision it will now be open to the petitioner to fil
e Form-II with the competent authority within three weeks and the 3 (B) proceeding shall be de
cided taking into consideration the Form-II at the instance of the petitioner.
Issue urgent certified copy of this order on proper application.
BISWANATH RATH,J.
sks
-2-
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Jhadeswar Rajak v. State of Orissa & OthersReferred¶3
Jhadeswar Rajak v. State of Orissa & Others, 2014(I) OLR 454
1 provisions across 1 enactments
BISWANATH RATH
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
BISWANATH RATH
Parties & counsel