The second appeal was disposed of on the basis of a compromise between the parties. The appellant paid Rs.15,00,000 towards permanent alimony, and the compromise petition was made part of the decree.
The compromise petition was made a part of the decree; Rs.15,00,000 paid towards permanent alimony.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
R.S.A. No.97 of 2006
07.09.2017 Heard Mr. S.K. Pattnaik, learned Senior Advocate along with Mr. P.K. Pattnaik, learned counsel for the appellant and Mr. P.K. Nayak, learned counsel for the respondent. Learned counsel for the parties submits that during pendency of the appeal, th e matter has been compromised between the parties. They further submit that the second appeal is disposed of in terms of the compromise.In terms of the compromise, learned counsel for the appellant has handed over a draft of Rs.15,00,000/- (rupees fifteen lakhs only) to the learned counsel for the responden t in Court today towards the permanent alimony of respondent. Considering the submission of learned counsel for the parties, the appeal is d
isposed of. The compromise petition shall form a part of the decree.
Dr.A.K.Rath, J.
2
Appellant
Respondent
Dr. A.K. Rath
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court