The High Court dismissed the writ petition for non-prosecution as the petitioners were absent and appeared to have no interest in the matter pending since 1996. The interim order dated 14.10.1996 was vacated.
The writ petition stands dismissed for non-prosecution. The interim order dated 14.10.1996 stands vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
O.J.C. No.9508 of 1996
5. 12.05.2017 None appears for the petitioners at the time of call. Le
arned counsel appearing for the opposite parties are present in Court. This matter is pending
since 1996. It appears the petitioners have no interest in the matter.
Accordingly, the writ petition stands dismissed for non-prosecution.
Interim order dated 14.10.1996 passed by this Court in Misc. Case No.848
7 of 1996 stands vacated.
.
BISWANATH RATH,J.
(JUDGE)
sks
-2-
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition should be dismissed for non-prosecution when petitioners do not appear despite pending status since 1996.
BISWANATH RATH
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court