Dismissed
Bangaroo v. R.L.Commnr.Central
Orissa HCOJC/9376/1997
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
The court dismissed the writ petition under OJC No. 9376 of 1997 since the petitioner did not appear even on a revised call, and the prayer did not deserve to be granted.
What did the court decide?
None; petition dismissed for non-appearance of petitioner and lack of merit.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
OJC No. 9376 of 1997
¶2
08. 18.08.2017 No one is present on behalf of the petitioner even on revised
call.
¶3
Having heard Shri Bibekananda Nayak, learned Central Government Counsel on beh
alf of the opposite parties and on perusal of record, we are of the opinion that in the facts
of the case, prayer made in this case does not deserve to be granted in the writ jurisdiction.
The petition is accordingly dismissed.
¶4
( VINEET SARAN )
CHIEF JUSTICE
¶5
....
( S.C. PARIJA )
JUDGE
¶6
SKJ
¶7
-2-
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- petitioner
Petitioner
- respondent
Opposite parties
Coram
AI extract
Vineet Saran
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court