Dismissed
Abhiram v. State
Orissa HCOJC/11477/1997
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
The writ petition was dismissed as infructuous due to the efflux of time, with no objection from the counsel for the petitioner. No substantive reasoning was recorded.
What did the court decide?
The writ petition was dismissed as being infructuous due to efflux of time.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
O.J.C. No.11477 of 1997
¶2
12. 10.07.2017 It has been submitted by learned Additional Government Advocat
e that the due to efflux of time, the prayer made in this writ petition has become infructuous
.
¶3
Learned counsel for the petitioner has not objected to such submission of lear
ned Additional Government Advocate.
¶4
Accordingly the case is dismissed being infructuous.
¶5
... Sanju Panda, J.
¶6
... S.N. Prasad, J.
¶7
mkp
1
Coram
AI extract
Sanju Panda
S.N. Prasad
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court