The appellant failed to appear in court on multiple occasions. The court observed that the appellant was no longer interested in pursuing the appeal. The MATA was dismissed for default.
Dismissal of MATA No.25 of 2016 for default.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
MATA No.25 of 2016
05. 24.03.2017 None appears for the appellant at the time of call.
It appears that the appellant is no longer interested to pursue this appeal si
nce there was non-appearance for the appellant on 10.2.2017 and 17.2.2017.
Accordingly, the MATA is dismissed for default.
I. Mahanty,J. Biswajit Mohanty,J.
2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to dismiss the appeal for default owing to the appellant's non-appearance?
MATA No.25 of 2016
I. Mahanty
Biswajit Mohanty
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court