Pramod K. Sahu v. State
Case brief
What is this about?
Criminal Miscellaneous Case dismissed for non-prosecution after court deemed the petitioner a recalitrant litigant for abandoning the brief four days before hearing.
What did the court decide?
CRLMC No.3640 of 2009 dismissed; interim order dated 14.01.2010 vacated; Local Court Record sent back.
What the court decided
CRLMC No.3640 of 2009
18.07.2017
It is stated on behalf of the learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner ha
s intimated them near about four days back to take back the brief from them as the conducting
counsel is not in a position to argue this matter. On earlier occasion, this Court had called
for the L.C.R. and specifically adjourned this matter to today. L.C.R. in this case has alread
y been received. In such view of the matter, this Court feels that the petitioner is a recalci
trant litigant and, as such, this CRLMC stands dismissed for non-prosecution.
Interim order dated 14.01.2010 passed in Misc. Case No.3106 of 2009 stands vacated.
L.C.R. received be sent back forthwith along with a copy of this order.
S.Pujahari, J.
2
Coram
S. Pujahari
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court