This court dismissed a revision petition challenging an order of taking cognizance under Sections 452, 323, 379, 506 and 34 of the IPC. Finding no illegality or infirmity in the lower court order, the petition was deemed devoid of merit.
The revision petition filed challenging the order of taking cognizance stood dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CRLMC No.1979 of 2010
17.07.2017
Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State.
The petitioners in this revision petition challenge the order dated 20.05.2010
passed by the learned S.D.J.M., Jajpur in I.C.C. No.12 of 2010 taking cognizance of the offen
ces under Sections 452, 323, 379, 506 read with Section 34 of IPC.
During the course of hearing, learned counsel for the petitioners could not br
ing to the notice of this Court any illegality or infirmity in the impugned order.
Hence, this revision petition filed being devoid of any merit stands dismissed
.
L.C.R. received be sent back forthwith along with a copy of this order.
S.Pujahari, J.
2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the revision petition challenging the impugned order of taking cognizance under the IPC merits being allowed.
2 provisions across 1 enactments
S.Pujahari
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court