Disposed
Susanta Ku.Behera v. State of Orissa
Orissa HCCMAPL/385/2016
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
of 2016 17.03.2017 We have heard learned…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CMAPL No. 385 of 2016
17.03.2017
We have heard learned counsel for the petitioner, Addl. Government Advocate for opposite parti
es no. 1 to 4 and Mr. K. Pattnaik, learned counsel for opposite party no.5.
No counter affidavit has been filed.
Having heard learned counsel for the parties, and on perusal of the affidavit filed al
ong with this application, we are satisfied with the sufficiency cause for non appearance of t
he petitioner on the date fixed. Accordingly, the order dated 15.07.2016 is recalled. The matt
er is restored to original file.
(DR.B.R.SARANGI)
JUDGE
D.R.B. Sarangi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court