Dismissed
Wildlife Society v. State
Orissa HCOJC/6148/1997
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
The High Court dismissed the writ petition, holding that the prayer made on behalf of the petitioner did not deserve to be granted considering the facts of the case in the writ jurisdiction.
What did the court decide?
Prayer made in the writ petition dismissed.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
O.J.C. No. 6148 of 1997
¶2
13. 16.03.2017 No one is present on behalf of the petitioner even on revised
call.
¶3
Having heard learned Government Advocate appearing for the State-opposite part
ies and on perusal of record, we are of the opinion that in the facts of the case, prayer made
in this case does not deserve to be granted in the writ jurisdiction.
The petition is accordingly dismissed.
¶4
....... ( VINEET SARAN )
¶5
CHIEF JUSTICE
¶6
-2-
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
AI extract
Whether the prayer made in the writ petition deserves to be granted.
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- petitioner
Petitioner
- respondent
State
Coram
AI extract
VINEET SARAN
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court