A bail application was disposed of after the petitioners withdrew it, leading to the vacation of an interim order restricting disengagement based on age.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
ABLAPL No.16259 of 2016
06.03.2017 Heard.
The learned counsel for the petitioners files a memo to withdraw the bail appl
ication.
Hence, the ABLAPL is disposed of withdrawn. The interim order dated 24.10.2016
, which was extended from time to time, stands vacated.
S.K. Mishra, J.
23.06.2011Misc.IntheCaseinterim,No.8721itofis2011directedthatthe petitioner no.2 shall not be d
isengaged only on the basis of attaining the age of 60 till the next date.
Urgent certified copy of this order be granted as per rules.
S.K. Mishra, J.
2
S.K. Mishra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court