2. It is apparent from the records that the petitioner was awarded with execution of construc
tion of work under the Prime Minister Gramya Sadak Yojana vide Agreement No.06 PMGSY of 2008-0
9 and Package No.0R-04-115/VII for agreement value of Rs.2,90,97,945/- with the date of commen
cement from 07.5.2008 and the date of completion on 06.2.2009. It is also apparent from the
record that there was another agreement vide Agreement No.59-PMGSY of 2009-10 vide Package
No.0R-04-171/VIII for agreement value of Rs.2,01,32,791/- with the date of commencement from
15.7.2009 and the date of completion on 14.7.2010.
3. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that in spite of hindrance and o
bstruction created by opposite party no.2 at the site, the petitioner completed the work and
also maintained the duration. His grievance is that even after completion of work and expiry
of maintenance period, opposite party no.2 has not settled the amount of the petitioner with r
espect to the aforesaid two works. In this regard, he has made representations to opposite p
arty no.2 vide Annexures-1 and 1/A, but it has yielded no result.
4. In that view of the matter, without expressing any opinion on merits of the claim of the
petitioner, this Court disposes of the writ petition directing opposite party no.2 to conside
r the representations of the petitioner and after affording reasonable opportunity of hearing
to the petitioner and all parties concerned and take a decision strictly in accordance with la
w within a period of thirty days from the date of production of certified copy of this order a
long with the copy of the brief and dispose of the same by a reasoned order. Opposite party n
o.2 shall act upon production of certified copy of this order.
5. Learned counsel for the petitioner undertakes to file the certified copy of this order as w
ell as the copy of the brief before opposite party no.2 within a period of ten days.
6. Urgent certified copy of this order be granted on proper application.
