This writ petition challenged an order rejecting an application to recall a previous order allowing evidence. The High Court found no infirmity in the impugned order and dismissed the petition as devoid of merits.
Interim order dated 22.8.2013 stood vacated; Writ petition and Misc. Case dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
W.P.(C) No.19355 of 2013
&
Misc. Case No.17795 of 2013
5. 16.2.2016 This writ petition has been filed challenging the order dated
08.8.2013, passed by the learned Civil Judge, (Jr. Divn.), 1st Court, Cuttack, in C.S. No.139
of 2012, rejecting the application of the defendant no.1-petitioner to recall the order allowi
ng the opposite party no.1 to adduce evidence in support of the claim.
Considering the submissions made, I do not find any infirmity in the i
mpugned order, so as to warrant any interference.
Interim order dated 22.8.2013 stands vacated.Writ petition and Misc. Case being devoid of merits, the same are accordingly dismissed.
S.C. Parija, J.
mp
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the High Court should interfere with an order dismissing an application to recall an order regarding adducing evidence.
Defendant no.1
Opposite party no.1
S.C. Parija
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court