This short writ petition challenged an order rejecting a suit amendment application. The court found no infirmity in the lower court's order and dismissed the petition as devoid of merits.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CMP No.204 of 2016
&
Misc. Case No.200 of 2016
02. 15.02.2016 Heard learned counsel for the parties.
This writ petition has been filed challenging the order dated
22.01.2016, passed by the learned Addl. Civil Judge (Senior Division), Balasore, in C.S. No.65
of 2005-I, rejecting the application of the plaintiff-petitioner filed under Order 6 Rule 17
C.P.C. for amendment of the suit.
Considering the submissions made, I do not find any infirmity
in the impugned order so as to warrant any interference.
CMP and Misc. Case being devoid of merits, the same are accord
ingly dismissed.
Issue urgent certified copy as per rules.
S.C. Parija, J.
uks
uks
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the High Court should interfere with the impugned order rejecting the application for amendment of the suit under Order 6 Rule 17 CPC.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
S.C. Parija
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court