The High Court held that a writ petition challenging inter se seniority between retired officers could not be adjudicated as both parties had retired from service. Liberty was granted to pursue the remedy before the appropriate forum.
Liberty granted to the petitioner to pursue his remedy before the appropriate forum.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C) No. 19223 of 2012
Bijaya Kumar Rout ….. Petitioner Mr. S.S. Das, Sr. Advocate,
Vs.
….. State of Orissa & Ors. Opposite parties
State Counsel
CORAM:
DR. JUSTICE B.R. SARANGI MISS JUSTICE SAVITRI RATHO
ORDER 25.03.2022
Order No.
7
This matter is taken up through hybrid mode.
……………………... ( DR. B.R. SARANGI ) JUDGE
…………….…………..……. ( SAVITRI RATHO ) JUDGE
2
Alok/Puspa
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the inter se seniority between a retired petitioner and a retired opposite party can be adjudicated in the present writ petition.
Bijaya Kumar Rout
State of Orissa
B.R. Sarangi
Savitri Ratho
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
