2. 25.10.2016 As it appears, the petitioners have revisional remedy as aga
inst the order passed under Annexure-5.
Reading the averments made in paragraph-13 of the writ petition, it appears petitioners have a
lready preferred a revision and it is alleged that even though the revision has been filed sin
ce 21.10.2016, the Collector is not passing any order protecting the petitioners till final ou
tcome in the revision and the petitioners are apprehending implementation of the order passed
by the appellate authority in the Encroachment Appeal No.17 of 2016 at any time.
Recording the submission of the petitioners that a revision is already pending before the Coll
ector, Khurda, the Collector, Khurda-opposite party no.2 is directed to take up the revision a
long with other applications considering the delay condonation application including the Inter
im Application and takeadecisiononthese two applications withina period of seven days.
Status quo, as on date, in respect of the disputed property shall be maintained
by all the concerned for these fifteen days.
