The writ petition challenging certain advertisements and a notification was dismissed as infructuous on the submission that the petitioner had already been promoted, vacating the interim order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
W.P.(C) No.16421 of 2007
04. 29.08.2016 Heard learned counsel for the parties.
This writ petition has been filed for quashing of the advertisements d
ated 5.12.2007, as per Annexures-1 and 2 respectively, published in the daily The Sambad and
the notification dated 19.11.2007, issued by the Special Officer (Spl. Cell), Orissa High Cour
t, Cuttack, as per Annexure-3 to the writ petition.
During course of hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner submits t
hat with the efflux of time, the petitioner has already been promoted and therefore, the writ
petition has become infructuous.
In view of such submission, the writ petition is dismissed as infructu
ous.
Interim order dated 18.12.2007 stands vacated.
S.C. Parija, J.
Dr. D.P. Choudhury, J.
2
uks
S.C. Parija
Dr. D.P. Choudhury
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court