Dismissed
Sobhamani v. State
Orissa HCOJC/8304/1996
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Writ petition registered as PIL was dismissed as infructuous because the petitioner had already been granted the relief sought during the pendency of the petition.
What did the court decide?
The writ petition was disposed of as infructuous.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
O.J.C. No. 8304 of 1996
¶2
07. 05.08.2016 This writ petition has been registered as public inter
est litigation on the basis of letter petition.
Mr. A.A. Das, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that during the pende
ncy of the writ petition, petitioner has been provided with the relief prayed for.
As such, the petition is disposed of as infructuous.
¶3
CHIEF JUSTICE
¶4
( DR. B.R. SARANGI )
JUDGE
dm
¶5
-2-
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
AI extract
Whether the writ petition should be dismissed as infructuous since the petitioner has been provided with the relief prayed for during the pendency of the petition.
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- petitioner
Petitioner
Coram
AI extract
DR. B.R. SARANGI
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court