Dismissed
Kusuda G.Panchayat v. State
Orissa HCOJC/6121/1995
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
The court dismissed the writ petition where no petitioner appeared on revised call. After hearing the State, the court ruled the prayer did not deserve granting in writ jurisdiction.
What did the court decide?
Petition dismissed as the prayer does not deserve to be granted in writ jurisdiction.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
OJC No. 6121 of 1995
¶2
26. 24.11.2016 No one is present on behalf of the petitioner even on revised
call.
¶3
Having heard learned Government Advocate appearing for State-opposite parties
and on perusal of record, we are of the opinion that in the facts of the case, prayer made in
this case does not deserve to be granted in the writ jurisdiction.
The petition is accordingly dismissed.
¶4
.......
( VINEET SARAN )
CHIEF JUSTICE
....
( DR. B.R. SARANGI )
JUDGE
dm
¶5
-2-
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
AI extract
Whether the prayer in the writ petition deserves to be granted.
Coram
AI extract
VINEET SARAN
DR. B.R. SARANGI
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court