Disposed
Harikrishan v. State
Orissa HCOJC/4727/1995
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Order correcting a typographical error in a year reference and directing the return of certified copies subject to substitution of xerox copies.
What did the court decide?
Certified copies of specific annexures to be returned subject to substitution of xerox copies.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
O.J.C. No.4727 of 1995
¶2
Misc. Case No.283 of 2016
18.03.11.2016This is a Misc. Case seeking correction of typographical error
crept in the order dated 8.9.2016 passed in O.J.C.No.4727 of 1995.
¶3
Finding a typographical order in mentioni
ng of the year as 15 reflected in the first page and second page of the order dated 8.9.2016 s
tands corrected and the same be read as 95.
¶4
Misc. Case is accordingly disposed of.
¶5
Misc. Case No.282 of 2016
¶6
19. 03.11.2016This is a Misc. Case seeking return of certified copies of Anne
xures- 9, 10, 11, 12, 14 and 15.
Considering the reasons stated in the application, certified copies of Annexures- 9, 10, 11,
12, 14 and 15 be returned subject to substitution of xerox copies thereof.
Misc. Case is accordingly disposed of.
¶7
.
BISWANATH RATH,J.
(JUDGE)
¶8
sks
¶9
-2-
Coram
AI extract
BISWANATH RATH
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court