Dismissed
Md.Jober v. Union of India
Orissa HCOJC/4602/1996
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Petitioner absent. Opposing counsel argued matter became infructuous due to efflux of time. Petitioner's writ petition was dismissed as infructuous.
What did the court decide?
Writ petition dismissed as infructuous.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
OJC No. 4602 of 1996
¶2
04. 25.07.2016 No one is present on behalf of the petitioner even on revised
call.
Learned counsel for the opposite party No.4 states that by efflux of time the
matter has become infructuous.
The writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.
¶3
........
( VINEET SARAN )
CHIEF JUSTICE
¶4
....
( DR. B.R. SARANGI )
JUDGE
dm
¶5
-2-
Coram
AI extract
Vineet Saran
Dr. B.R. Sarangi
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court