Dismissed
Narayan Ch.Das v. Collector,Bhadrak
Orissa HCOJC/1072/1994
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
1072 of 1994 05. 29.11.2016 No one is…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
OJC No. 1072 of 1994
05. 29.11.2016 No one is present on behalf of the petitioners even on revised
call.
Having heard learned Government Advocate appearing for State-opposite parties
and on perusal of record, we are of the opinion that in the facts of the case, prayer made in
this case does not deserve to be granted in the writ jurisdiction.
The petition is accordingly dismissed.
.......
( VINEET SARAN )
CHIEF JUSTICE
....
( DR. B.R.SARANGI )
JUDGE
dm
-2-
State
VINEET SARAN
DR. B.R. SANGARI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court