Dismissed
Rabindra Kumar Das v. Chandramani Das
Orissa HCFAO/197/2005
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Appeal against an order appointing the appellants as receiver and directing deposit of usufruct proceeds. The court held that due to the lapse of over 10 years, no purpose would be served in interfering on merit and disposed of the appeal with a direction to seek variation via appropriate application before the trial court.
What did the court decide?
Appeal disposed of without interference on merit; appellants directed to seek variation of the impugned order by filing appropriate application before the learned trial Court if so advised.