A petitioner's counsel did not dispute that the impugned order in W.P.(C) No. 12524 of 2015 was complied with, resulting in the disposal of the contempt petition.
The contempt petition was disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CONTC No. 568 of 2016
09.05.2016 On having received instruction, Mr. B.P. Pradhan, learned Addl. Government Advocate su
bmits that the order dated 05.01.2016 passed in W.P.(C) No. 12524 of 2015 has already been com
plied with.
Learned counsel for the petitioner does not dispute the said fact.
In view of the aforesaid, the contempt petition stands disposed of.
(DR.B.R.SARANGI)
JUDGE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court