Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is the son of the decea
sed Ganesh Sindur and he is in custody since 9.9.2015 and in the meantime, after completion of
investigation, charge sheet has been submitted against the petitioner under Sections 302/201
of Indian Penal Code. It is the contention of learned counsel for the petitioner that there ar
e no eye witnesses to the occurrence and the case is based on circumstantial evidence. He furt
her submits that there are no clinching circumstances available on record to indicate that it
is the petitioner who has committed the crime rather on the fateful day, it appears that the p
etitioner came to the house of the neighbor namely Sarojini Bisar and asked her to provide foo
d to the deceased and accordingly one Kishore Bisar, who is the son of Sarojini Bisar provided
food to the deceased. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that on the very ne
xt day when the petitioner