Bairaghi Charan Pradhan v. State of Orissa
Case brief
What is this about?
This successive bail application was dismissed. The court refused anticipatory bail regarding offences under IPC and other statutes due to the petitioner's long-standing abscondence. However, liberty was granted to surrender within 21 days to seek bail.
What did the court decide?
Liberty granted to surrender within 21 working days and then move for bail.
What the court decided
ABLAPL No.16428 of 2016
06.12.2016
unsel.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Addl. Standing Co
This is a successive bail application filed by the petitioner.
The petitioner is apprehending arrest for the alleged commission of offence under Sections 147
, 148, 294, 452, 302/149 of the IPC read with Section 9-B of the Explosives Act and Sections 2
5 and 27 of the Arms Act in G.R. Case No.242/2001 of the court of learned SDJM, Puri, arising
out of Brahmagiri P.S. Case No.24/2001.
In a split up trial, the counsel for the petitioner submits that the co-accuse
d, as per the judgment dated 19.05.2016 has been acquitted of the charges. Therefore, petition
er-counsel submits that the petitioner should be granted to anticipatory bail. However, it is
borne out from the records that the petitioner has been absconding since the year, 2001 and th
ere is every possibility that processes under Sections 82 and/or 83 of the Cr.P.C. have been i
ssued against him.
In that view of the matter, though this Court is not inclined to grant anticip
atory bail to the petitioner but gives liberty to the petitioner to surrender before the learn
ed SDJM, Puri in the aforesaid case in the first hour within 21 working days hence and move fo
r bail. On such event, the learned magistrate shall consider his application for bail in the f
irst hour strictly on the basis of the materials on record. In case of rejection of the bail a
pplication, the petitioner may move for bail before the learned Sessions Judge, Puri or 2nd Ad
dl. Sessions Judge, Puri in the second hour. On such event, the learned Judge shall consider
and dispose of the bail application of the
petitioner on the same day strictly on the basis of the materials on record. If the learned Ju
dge comes to the conclusion that petitioner stands in the same footing as the acquitted accuse
d, he may pass appropriate orders. However, the learned Judge shall examine from the LCR and f
ind out, if any processes under Sections 82 and or 83 Cr.P.C. have been issued. If such proces
ses have been issued, it is open for him to reject the bail application of the petitioner.
The ABLAPL is disposed of.
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the petitioner is eligible for anticipatory bail given his history of absconding since 2001.
Whether anticipatory bail should be granted despite the acquittal of a co-accused.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Petitioner
Coram
S.K. Mishra
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court