It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that in addition to
the offence has registered by the Police an offence under Section 307 of the IPC is also made
out as Investigating Officer has not taken appropriate step for investigation of the case. Lea
rned counsel for the informant has already approached this Court by filing a writ petition (cr
iminal), which is pending for consideration. Carefully examined the statement of witnesses as
well as injury report. The contention raised by the learned counsel for the petitioner that th
e offence under Section 307 of the IPC is also made out is not tenable. Moreover, in support o
f allegation that the petitioner has threatened to kill in her by means of a crow bar compress
ing on her neck and that they left her considering her to be death is not supported by medical
opinion as no injury was found on her neck. One small linear abrasion measuring 3 c.m x 1/10
c.m. was found on the dorsum aspect of her right hand. This Court is of the opinion that no of
fence under Section 307 of the IPC is made out against the petitioner. None of the offences al
leged to have been committed by the petitioner is punishable with a term of imprisonment excee
ding seven years. The petitioner is a permanent resident of village Kesorpur, P.S.-Bansada, Di
st.-Bhadrak and there is no chance of his absconding from justice. There is no allegation on b
ehalf of the State that the petitioner shall tamper with the prosecution evidence, if he is re
leased on bail.