Allowed

Parbe Nayak v. State of Orissa

Orissa HC29 Aug 2016ABLAPL/13825/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The court allowed a petition for pre-arrest bail implicating the petitioners in offences under Sections 498-A, 294, 506, 323, 34 IPC and Section 4 D.P. Act. It directed arresting officers to release the petitioners on bail upon furnishing a bond and sureties, subject to cooperation in the investigation.

What did the court decide?

Directed that in the even of arrest of the petitioners in connection with the aforesaid case they be released on bail by furnishing bail bond of Rs. 20,000/:- with two solvent sureties each for the li

Parbe Nayak Vs State of Orissa — Anticipatory Bail | Orissa HC (2016)

¶1

 ABLAPL No. 13825 of 2016
02. 29.08.2016 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the
learned counsel for the State.

¶2

 The petitioners in this case having been implicated in Tumudibandh P.S
. Case No.52 of 2016 corresponding to G.R. Case No.333 of 2016 pending in court of learned SDJ
M, Baliguda for alleged commission of offences punishable under Sections 498-A/294/506/323/34
of IPC & Section 4 of D.P. Act, have filed this petition for their release on pre-arrest bail.

¶3

 Regard being had to the facts and submissions made, especially the nat
ure of accusation and circumstances in which the offences alleged to have been committed and h
ardly any material is there to suggest the fact that the petitioners shall abscond or tamper w
ith the prosecution evidence, if allowed to go on pre-arrest bail, I am of the view that this
is a fit case to enlarge the petitioners on pre-arrest bail.

¶4

 Hence, this Court directs that in the event of arrest of the petitione
rs in connection with the aforesaid case, they be released on bail on each of them furnishing
bail bond of Rs.20,000/-(Rupees twenty thousand) with two solvent sureties each for the like a
mount to the satisfaction of the Arresting Officer with the condition that they shall co-opera
te with the investigation.

¶5

 However, it is made clear that if any graver offence is found against
the petitioners in this case besides the aforesaid offences, this order shall not be given eff
ect to.

¶6

 The ABLAPL is accordingly disposed of being allowed.
 Urgent certified copy of this order be granted on proper application.

¶7

Parbe Nayak v. State of Orissa

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Parbe Nayak v. State of Orissa

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Case details

Similar cases

Amulya Ku.Jena Vs State of Orissa

Manas Ranjan Nayak@Baya Vs State of Orissa

Kunu@Kunta Dalei Vs State of Orissa

Mrutyunjay Mohanty Vs State of Orissa

Samir Pradhan Vs State of Orissa

Sridhar Baliarsingh Vs State of Orissa