Allowed

Mrutyunjay Mohanty v. State of Orissa

Orissa HC29 Aug 2016ABLAPL/13777/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Single Judge allowed the petition for pre-arrest bail, directing the arrest to be followed by release on bond of Rs.20,000 with two sureties, conditioned on cooperation in investigation, subject to the order not applying if graver offences are discovered.

What did the court decide?

Release on bail bond of Rs.20,000 with two solvent sureties, conditional on cooperation in investigation and subject to discovery of graver offences.

Mrutyunjay Mohanty Vs State of Orissa — Anticipatory Bail | Orissa HC (2016)

¶1

 02. 29.08.2016 ABLAPL No. 13777 of 2016
 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned counsel for the State.
 The petitioners in this case having been implicated in Chandrasekharpu
r P.S. Case No.330 of 2016 corresponding to C.T. Case No.3539 of 2016 pending in court of lear
ned SDJM, Bhubaneswar for alleged commission of offences punishable under Sections 341/323/498
-A/34 of IPC & Section 4 of D.P. Act, have filed this petition for their release on pre-arrest
 bail.

¶2

 Regard being had to the facts and submissions made, especially the nat
ure of accusation and circumstances in which the offences alleged to have been committed and h
ardly any material is there to suggest the fact that the petitioners shall abscond or tamper w
ith the prosecution evidence, if allowed to go on pre-arrest bail, I am of the view that this
is a fit case to enlarge the petitioners on pre-arrest bail.

¶3

 Hence, this Court directs that in the event of arrest of the petitione
rs in connection with the aforesaid case, they be released on bail on each of them furnishing
bail bond of Rs.20,000/-(Rupees twenty thousand) with two solvent sureties each for the like a
mount to the satisfaction of the Arresting Officer with the condition that they shall co-opera
te with the investigation.

¶4

 However, it is made clear that if any graver offence is found against
the petitioners in this case besides the aforesaid offences, this order shall not be given eff
ect to.
 The ABLAPL is accordingly disposed of being allowed.
 Urgent certified copy of this order be granted on proper application.

¶5

SKG

¶6

Mrutyunjay Mohanty v. State of Orissa

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mrutyunjay Mohanty v. State of Orissa

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Amulya Ku.Jena Vs State of Orissa

Manas Ranjan Nayak@Baya Vs State of Orissa

Kunu@Kunta Dalei Vs State of Orissa

Parbe Nayak Vs State of Orissa

Samir Pradhan Vs State of Orissa

Sridhar Baliarsingh Vs State of Orissa