Disposed

Ugrasena Petia v. State and Ors.

Orissa HC11 Aug 2015WP(C)/23036/2013

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Disposes of the writ petition by directing the Collector to determine the petitioner's claim within eight weeks, granting liberty to file fresh representation, and setting a timeline for the consequential benefit decision.

What did the court decide?

Liberty to file fresh representation with the Collector, Koraput; direction to decide the claim within eight weeks; direction to grant consequential benefit within four weeks if entitled, or pass a sp

Ugrasena Petia Vs State and Ors. — Constitutional and Fundamental Rights | Orissa HC (2015)

¶1

 W.P.(C) No.23036 of 2013

¶2

02. 11.08.2015 None appears on behalf of the parties due to resolution passed
 by the Orissa High Court Bar Association to cease work.

¶3

 On perusal of the pleadings made in the writ petition, it transpires that the
decision at the first instance is to be taken for determining the claim of the petitioner by t
he opposite parties.

¶4

 Hence, without going into the merit of the claim of the petitioner, the writ p
etition is disposed of giving liberty to the petitioner to file fresh representation along wit
h the certified copy of this order before the opposite party no.2- Collector, Koraput who will
 take decision within a reasonable period preferably within eight weeks from the date of recei
pt of representation by passing the speaking order after providing an opportunity of being hea
rd to the petitioner including affected parties, if any.

¶5

 If the opposite party no.2 will come to conclusion that the petitioner is enti
tled to be given consequential benefit, same shall be extended in his favour within four weeks
 from the date of such decision as indicated in the preceding paragraph.
 If the opposite party shall come to finding that the petitioner is not entitled to be gi
ven such benefit, same shall be communicated to him by passing a speaking order within the per
iod aforesaid.
 With such observation and direction, the writ petition is disposed of accordingly.

¶6

 ... S.N. Prasad, J.

¶7

Sukanta

¶8

Ugrasena Petia v. State and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ugrasena Petia v. State and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Basanti Nayak Vs State of Odisha

Debendra Nimala Vs State and Ors.

Anirudha Mandangi Vs State and Ors.

Suchitra Mallik Vs Collector,Kendrapara

Rabindra Panda Vs State of Orissa

Aurobinda Rautaray Vs State of Orissa