Susmita Mallick v. Susanta Ku.Mallick
Orissa HCTRP(C)/206/2015
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
No.206 of 2015 21.12.2015 Perused the office…
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
¶1
TRP(C) No.206 of 2015
¶2
21.12.2015
¶3
Perused the office note.
¶4
It appears that in 2nd line of 6th paragraph, instead of learned Judge, Family Court
, Bhubaneswar,, the same has been inadvertently mentioned as learned Judge, Family Court, Jajp
ur.
¶5
Accordingly, the learned Judge, Family Court, Jajpur mentioned in the 2nd line of 6t
h paragraph be read as learned Judge, Family Court, Bhubaneswar,.
¶6
Rest part of the order dated 3.12.2015 remains unaltered.
¶7
Learned counsel for the petitioner-wife submits that opposite party is presently res
iding at Qr. No.5179, Hal Township, PO/PS-Sunabeda, District-Koraput.
¶8
Therefore, learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to make necessary correct
ion in the cause title.
¶9
Registry is directed to intimate the trial court accordingly.
¶10
Dr.A.K.Rath,J
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- petitioner
Petitioner-wife
- respondent
Opposite party
Coram
AI extract
Dr. A.K. Rath
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court