OF 2015 03.8.2015. Heard learned counsel for…
Application for anticipatory bail is allowed; upon arrest, petitioners shall be released on bail on terms deemed just.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
ABLAPL NO.9799 OF 2015
03.8.2015. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Addl. Government Advocate for t
he State.
2. Petitioners are apprehending arrest for the alleged commission of offences under Sections
341/294/354-B/506/34 of the I.P.C. in G.R. Case No.527/2015 of the court of learned J.M.F.C.(
P), Kujang arising out of Paradeep Lock P.S. Case No.89/2015.
3. There is counter case for the self-same occurrence against the informant for the alleged
commission of offence under Sections 294/435/506 of the I.P.C. read with Section 3(1)(x) of th
e S.C. and S.T. (P.A.) Act.
4. Keeping in view the aforesaid consideration, nature of the allegations made and the fact s of the case, application for anticipatory bail is allowed. In the event of arrest of the pet itioners in the aforesaid case, they shall be released on bail by the arresting officer on suc h terms and conditions as deemed just and proper by him.
The ABLAPL is disposed of.
Urgent certified copy of this order be granted on proper application.
S.K.Mishra, J
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioners are entitled to anticipatory bail against apprehended arrest in a criminal case involving offences under sections 341, 294, 354-B, 506, and 34 of the IPC.
3 provisions across 2 enactments
Petitioners
State
S.K.Mishra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court