In an original application filed by a resident against pollution control officials and lease holders, the applicant counsel sought to withdraw the matter. Consequently, the National Green Tribunal Southern Zone dismissed the application as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Item No.04:-
BEFORE THE NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL SOUTHERN ZONE, CHENNAI
Monday, the day of 06th July, 2026.
(Through Physical Hearing (Hybrid Option)
Original Application No.58 of 2026 (SZ)
IN THE MATTER OF:
E. Lakshmipathy,
S/o. L. Elumalai, Aged about 38 years, No.71, Pulianthope Street, Pandiyampakkam Village, Cheyyar Taluk, Tiruvannamalai District – 631 701. …Applicant(s)
Versus
6) Mr. S. Santhosh,
Quarry Lease Holder, No.269/96, MTH Road, Mannurpettai Taluk, Padi, Thiruvallur District – 600050.
...Respondent(s)
Page 1 of 2
For Applicant(s): Mr. S. Vedhavel.
For Respondent(s): None.
CORAM :
HON’BLE SMT. JUSTICE PUSHPA SATHYANARAYANA, JUDICIAL MEMBER
HON’BLE DR. PRASHANT GARGAVA, EXPERT MEMBER
JUDGMENT
1. After hearing the learned counsel appearing for the applicant for some time, he wanted to withdraw the Original Application and made an endorsement to that effect.
2. In view of the endorsement made, this Original Application [O.A. No.58 of 2026(SZ)] is dismissed as withdrawn.
Sd/-
Smt. Justice Pushpa Sathyanarayana, JM
Sd/Dr. Prashant Gargava, EM
O.A. No.58/2026 (SZ) 06th July 2026. NS.
Page 2 of 2
E. Lakshmipathy
Tamil Nadu Pollution Control Board
District Collector, Tiruvannamalai
Revenue Divisional Officer, NH-66
Tahsildhar, Tiruvannamalai
Regional Joint Director, Department of Geology and Mining
Pushpa Sathyanarayana
Prashant Gargava
As recorded by the court registry
An original application before a tribunal, most commonly a service dispute before the Central or a State Administrative Tribunal.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
