Dismissed

International Environment Sansad through Its President v. State of Rajasthan through Chief Secretary

NGT2 Jul 2026Original Application No. 39/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The NGT Central Zone Bench, Bhopal held that the original application seeking cancellation of mining leases is not maintainable as the applicant must approach the appropriate forum for such relief. The application was disposed of accordingly.

What did the court decide?

The Original Application No.39/2026(CZ) is not maintainable and is disposed of; pending I.A.s also disposed of.

International Environment Sansad through Its President… — Mining and Natural Resources | NGT (2026)

¶1

Item No.01

¶2

BEFORE THE NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL CENTRAL ZONE BENCH, BHOPAL (THROUGH PHYSICAL HEARING (WITH HYBRID OPTION)

¶3

Original Application No.39/2026(CZ) (I.A. No.43/2026)

¶4

International Environment Sansad Applicant(s)

¶5

Vs.

¶6

State of Rajasthan & Ors. Respondent(s)

¶7

Date of Hearing: 02.07.2026

¶8

CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SHEO KUMAR SINGH, JUDICIAL MEMBER HON’BLE MR. SUDHIR KUMAR CHATURVEDI, EXPERT MEMBER

¶9

For Applicant (s): Mr. P. D. Saaran, in person

¶10

ORDER

¶11

As per the records, both husband and wife have created a trust, namely, International Environment Sansad, and P. D. Saaran (Prabhu Dayal Saaran), the husband, became the President and Managing Trustee. Documents reveals that the second member has no active role.

¶12

Main relief as sought is to cancel all the leases on land marked as ‘Gair Mumkin Pahar’ and to declare that the application is within the limitation period. Both the prayers are not maintainable as per law. The basic idea behind filing the application as per attached paper is the State land which is 44.0500 hectares and 9.0400 hectares and further as narrated in the application addressed to the Mining Engineer, there are some disputes and claim with regard to the 300 bighas of land which is recorded as the State land.

¶13

For cancellation of any land or mining lease issued by the competent authority, the Applicant may approach to the appropriate forum for cancellation of the same.

¶14

¶15

O.A. No.39/2026(CZ) International Environment Sansad Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors.

¶16

The Original Application No.39/2026(CZ) as filed is not maintainable

¶17

and the same is disposed of accordingly.

¶18

Pending I.As., if any, also stand disposed of accordingly.

¶19

Sheo Kumar Singh, JM

¶20

Sudhir Kumar Chaturvedi, EM

¶21

02^nd July, 2026, Original Application No.39/2026(CZ) (I.A. No.43/2026) AK

¶22

¶23

O.A. No.39/2026(CZ) International Environment Sansad Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors.

International Environment Sansad through Its President v. State of Rajasthan through Chief Secretary

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

International Environment Sansad through Its President v. State of Rajasthan through Chief Secretary

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

J. Chandran vs Government of Tamilnadu

Rema Raina vs Muncipal Corporation of Gurugram

Himanshu Mittal vs Union of India

Meherram Digambar Gadekar vs Pune Municipal Corporation

Venkatapathi Raja Yenumala vs Union of India

Shri Ashutosh Kumar vs Gujarat Fluorochemicals Ltd.

Suresh Bisen vs State of Madhya Pradesh through Secretory Revenue Department

Mijanur Hossain vs State of West Bengal

Ratnawali Gaushala Anandhdham vs District Collector Jaipur

Dharmendra Kumar Sharma vs Rajasthan State Pollution Control Board through Member Secretary

Shivam Saxena vs M/S Hotel Ranjit Lake View

Badri vs State of Rajasthan

Rajesh Rangari S/O Shri Kanhaiya Lal Rangari vs Union of India Ministry of Environment Forest & Climate Change through Its Secretary

International Environment Sansad through Its President vs State of Rajasthan through Chief Secretary