Dismissed
Sunil S Mulye v. Union of India
NGTIA No. 857/2025 in Original Application No. 2/2023
What the court decided
AI extract
Outcome
Dismissed
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Item No.02 Pune Bench
BEFORE THE NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL WESTERN ZONE BENCH, PUNE
THROUGH PHYSICAL HEARING (WITH HYBRID OPTION)
Original Application No.02/2023(WZ) In
Sunil S. Mulye & Ors. Applicants
Versus
Union of India, through MoEF & Ors. Respondent(s)
Date of hearing: 16.02.2026
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH, JUDICIAL MEMBER HON’BLE DR. SUJIT KUMAR BAJPAYEE, EXPERT MEMBER
Applicants: Mr. Bipin Joshi, Advocate for applicant no.1 Mr. Madhur Rai, Advocate for applicant no.2 (I.A.No.188/23)
Respondents: Mr. Pushkal Mishra, Advocate for R-1
Mr. Aniruddha Kulkarni, Advocate for R-2
Ms. Manasi Joshi, Advocate for R-3 & 4
Mr. Shivshankar Swaminathan, Advocate for R-6 Mr. Mukesh Verma, Advocate for R-8/SWA
ORDER
857/2025(WZ), whereby he has prayed that he may be permitted to bring on record the Wetland Brief document for Palghar District which was submitted by them before Hon’ble High Court in Writ Petition No. 303 of 2018 and has been annexed herein as Exhibit-A to the application. We find that at page no. 718 of the paper book, there is reference of survey nos. 176/A/I/A and 177 recorded as ‘wetland’.
record with permission to the respondents to file document in rebuttal, if required, within a period of two weeks.
1
Dinesh Kumar Singh, JM
Dr. Sujit Kumar Bajpayee, EM
February 16, 2026 R
2
Sunil S. Mulye
Union of India
Dinesh Kumar Singh
Sujit Kumar Bajpayee
As recorded by the court registry
An application for interim relief made while the main matter is pending.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court