Disposed

Rohit Singh v. State of Himachal Pradesh

NGT3 Feb 2026IA No. 78/2026 in Original Application No. 561/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This order grants procedural applications in an original application concerning environmental concerns. The court allowed amendments and impleadment applications, directed filing of replies and affidavits, and listed the matter for future hearing.

What did the court decide?

Allowed I.A. Nos. 27, 76, and 78; directed filing of replies; listed on 21.04.2025.

Rohit Singh vs State of Himachal Pradesh — Environment and Pollution | NGT (2026)

¶1

Court No. 1

¶2

Item No. 23

¶3

BEFORE THE NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL PRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHI

¶4

Original Application No. 561/2025 (IA No 27/2026, IA No 75/2026, IA No 76/2026, IA No 77/2026,

¶5

IA No 78/2026, IA No 720/2025)

¶6

Rohit Singh Applicant

¶7

Versus

¶8

State of Himachal Pradesh & Ors.

¶9

Respondent(s)

¶10

Date of hearing: 03.02.2026

¶11

CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAKASH SHRIVASTAVA, CHAIRPERSON HON’BLE DR. A. SENTHIL VEL, EXPERT MEMBER

¶12

Applicant: Mr. Rohit Singh, Applicant in person (Through VC) Respondents: Mr. Ketan Paul, Mr. Prachit Sharma & Ms. Shreya Pandey, Advs. for R - 1, 2 & 4 Mr. Naveen Kumar, Adv. for MoEF & CC (Through VC) Mr. Ajay Marwah & Mr. Swaroopananda Mishra, Advs. in I.A. 27/2026

¶13

ORDER

¶14

The reply on behalf of Respondent No. 3 HPPCB has been filed. Learned Counsel for the Respondent No. 1, 2, 4 and 5 submits that replies have been filed yesterday. The Registry is directed to examine it and place on record. Rejoinder, if any, can be filed by the Applicant within four weeks.

¶15

I.A. No. 27/2026 has been filed for impleadment/intervention by Haroli Crushers Employers Association. The applicant is granted four weeks’ time to file reply to the I.A.

¶16

I.A. No. 76/2026 has been filed by the applicant for amendment of the OA. On due consideration, the I.A. is allowed and the applicant is permitted to carryout the amendment in the O.A. and file amended copy of the O.A.

¶17

¶18

I.A. No. 78/2026 has been filed for impleadment of the additional respondents. The applicant is seeking the impleadment of as many as four additional respondents. On due consideration, the I.A. is allowed. The applicant is directed to amend the cause title of the O.A. and also file amended memo of parties. He is also directed to serve the newly added respondents and file affidavit of service at least one week before the next date of hearing.

¶19

List on 21.04.2025.

¶20

Prakash Shrivastava, CP

¶21

Dr. A. Senthil Vel, EM

¶22

February 03, 2026 O.A. No. 561/2025 HB

¶23

Rohit Singh v. State of Himachal Pradesh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rohit Singh v. State of Himachal Pradesh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mr Suryakant J Shelake vs Ms Skb Builder India Pvt. Ltd.

Sudesh Kumar vs State of Haryana

Sudesh Kumar vs State of Haryana

Dr Rajesh Bahuguna vs State of Uttarakhand

Suo Motu Activists Local Residents Question Legality of Tourism Development Work at Ooty Lake vs the District Collector Nilgiris

Sarang Yadwadkar vs Pune Municipal Corporation through Municipal Commissioner

M/S Rameshwar Stone Supplier vs Seiaa

Nilkanth Stone Industries vs Seiaa

Sudesh Kumar vs State of Haryana

Sudesh Kumar vs State of Haryana

Dr Rajesh Bahuguna vs State of Uttarakhand

Rohit Singh vs Ministry of Environment Forest and Climate Change

Rohit Singh vs State of Himachal Pradesh

Aditya Singh vs State of Uttar Pradesh