Partly allowed

M/S Sairam Realtors v. State Environment Impact Assessment Authority (Maharashtra)

NGT3 Feb 2026Appeal No. 628/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

M/s Sairam Realtors appealed against an Environmental Clearance issued by SEIAA, seeking its quashing regarding land demarcation as a wetland area. The court allowed a condonation of delay application. Upon hearing, respondents 1 and 5 conceded to the quashing of the specific direction. The court accordingly quashed the Environmental Clearance to the extent of keeping the area in abeyance and dism

What did the court decide?

The appeal is disposed of; the EC is quashed to the extent of keeping 242.12 sqms in abeyance as wetland.

M/S Sairam Realtors vs State Environment Impact… — Environment and Pollution | NGT (2026)

¶1

Item No. 07 Pune Bench

¶2

BEFORE NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL WESTERN ZONE BENCH, PUNE [THROUGH PHYSICAL HEARING (WITH HYBRID OPTION]

¶3

I.A.No.866/2025(WZ)

¶4

¶5

Appeal No.628/2025(WZ)

M/s Sairam Realtors

Appellant

Versus

State Environment Impact Assessment Authority (Maharashtra) Respondent

¶10

Date of hearing: 03.02.2026

¶11

CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH, JUDICIAL MEMBER HON’BLE DR. SUJIT KUMAR BAJPAYEE, EXPERT MEMBER

¶12

Appellant Mr. Saurabh Kulkarni a/w Mr. Shambhu Jha, Advs. for Appellant. Respondent: Mr. Anirudha Kulkarni a/w Mr. Savyasachi Bharadwaj, Adv. for R1 Mr. Om Shankar Shrivastava, Adv. for R.2

¶13

Ms. Manasi Joshi, Adv. for R.3

¶14

ORDER

¶15

This appeal has been filed seeking quashing of the Environmental Clearance (EC) dated 21.09.2025 issued by respondent no.1-SEIAA to the extent that it keeps 242.12 sqms of the project site in abeyance as “wetland area” and direct the appellant to obtain a NOC from State Wetland Authority.

¶16

The appeal has been filed with the delay of 33 days, for condoning which IA 866/2025 has been moved. No objection has been filed against the same by the respondents. Therefore, same is allowed.

¶17

Against the main appeal, from the side of respondent no.1-SEIAA and respondent no.5-State Wetland Authority, Mr. Aniruddha Kulkarni, Learned Counsel has put in appearance and states that he has no objection

¶18

¶19

to the EC dated 21.09.2025 being quashed to the extent that it directs to keep 242.12 sqms of the project site in abeyance as wetland area.

¶20

From the side of respondent no.2-MoEF&CC, Mr. Om Shankar Shrivastava, Learned Counsel has put in appearance and states that he does not want to file reply.

¶21

From the side of respondent no.3-MPCB, Ms. Mansi Joshi, Learned Counsel has put in appearance and states that she does not want to file reply.

¶22

No one has appeared from the side of respondent no.4.

¶23

Since the respondent no. 1 and 4 have conceded prayer made by project proponent/appellant, therefore, we quash the EC to the extent that it keeps 242.12 sqms of the project site in abeyance as wetland.

¶24

Accordingly, we dispose of this appeal.

¶25

Dinesh Kumar Singh, JM

¶26

Dr. S.K. Bajpayee, EM

¶27

February 03, 2026 I.A.No.866/2025(WZ) In Appeal No.628/2025(WZ) JG.

¶28

M/S Sairam Realtors v. State Environment Impact Assessment Authority (Maharashtra)

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M/S Sairam Realtors v. State Environment Impact Assessment Authority (Maharashtra)

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ms Landmark Ventures through Its Partner Krishna Kumar Shrivastava vs Member Secretary Madhya Pradesh Pollution Control Board

Mrs Vasundhra vs Member Secretary Tnsczma Director Department of Environment and Climate Change

Thiru K Ravikumar vs 1. State Environment Impact Assessment Authoritytamilnadu

T Balu vs State Environment Impact Assessment Authority Tamil Nadu

Nilkanth Stone Industries vs Seiaa

M/S Rameshwar Stone Supplier vs Seiaa

Ms Twilight Craft Papers Pvt. Ltd. vs State of Gujarat

Surjeet Singh vs the Member Secretary State Environment Impact Assessment Authority Paryavaran Parisar

Taloja Industries Association vs Ministry of Environment Forest and Climate Change

Prasad Haribhau Jadhav vs Godavari Biorefineries Ltd.

Mr Suryakant J Shelake vs Ms Skb Builder India Pvt. Ltd.

M/S Sairam Realtors vs State Environment Impact Assessment Authority (Maharashtra)

M/S Sairam Realtors vs Ministry of Environment Forest and Climate Change

M/S. Enviro Technology Limited vs State Environment Impact Assessment Authority (Seiaa) Gujarat