Appeal against PCB direction restoring electricity supply dismissed as nothing survives due to the unit's subsequent closure.
Appeal disposed of as nothing survives post-closure of the respondent unit.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. 1
Item No.11
BEFORE THE NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL PRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHI
Appeal No. 47/2025
Sunil Verma Appellant
Versus
Punjab Pollution Control Board & Ors.
Respondent(s)
Date of hearing: 02.04.2026
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAKASH SHRIVASTAVA, CHAIRPERSON HON’BLE DR. AFROZ AHMAD, EXPERT MEMBER
Appellant: Mr. Chiranshu Rattan, Advocate for Appellant
Respondents: Ms. Deepmala Chauhan, Adv. for R - 1 & 2 Ms. Unnati Anand, Adv. for R - 3
ORDER
1
operated and after expiry of the CTO, respondent no.3 is lying closed since 10.09.2025.
Prakash Shrivastava, CP
Dr. Afroz Ahmad, EM
April 02, 2026 Appeal No. 47/2025 JG.
2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the appeal challenging the extension of electricity supply survives subsequent closure of the respondent unit.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Sunil Verma
Punjab Pollution Control Board
Respondent no.3
Prakash Shrivastava
Dr. Afroz Ahmad
As recorded by the court registry
An appeal before a tribunal against an order of a statutory authority.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
