The National Green Tribunal disposed of an application challenging the setting up of a Gaushala, dismissing it for lack of prima facie material supporting the claim of tree felling or mandatory environmental clearance.
The original application was disposed of without adjudication on merits due to lack of prima facie material.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Item No. 03 Court No. 1
BEFORE THE NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL PRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHI
| Original Application No.216/2025 | ||
|---|---|---|
| Anil Kumar Singh | Applicant | |
| Versus |
State of Uttar Pradesh & Ors. Respondent(s)
Date of hearing: 06.05.2025
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAKASH SHRIVASTAVA, CHAIRPERSON HON’BLE DR. A. SENTHIL VEL, EXPERT MEMBER HON’BLE DR. AFROZ AHMAD, EXPERT MEMBER
Applicant: Mr. Kartikay Singh, Adv. for Applicant (Through VC)
ORDER
1
norms, then he will be at liberty to approach the competent authority with full details, and in case, if, such an approach is made, the competent authority will duly look into the grievance.
Prakash Shrivastava, CP
Dr. A. Senthil Vel, EM
Dr. Afroz Ahmad, EM
May 06, 2025 Original Application No.216/2025 JG..
2
3 issues framed by the court
Whether material has been placed on record to substantiate the apprehension that setting up a Gaushala will result in felling of about 133 trees.
Whether prior Environmental Clearance is required for setting up a Gaushala and if so under which provision of the Environment Impact Assessment Notification, 2006.
Whether the claim for setting up a Gaushala requires prima facie material in support before proceeding with the grievance.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Anil Kumar Singh
State of Uttar Pradesh & Ors.
Prakash Shrivastava
A. Senthil Vel
Afroz Ahmad
As recorded by the court registry
An original application before a tribunal, most commonly a service dispute before the Central or a State Administrative Tribunal.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
