Akhilesh Kumar v. State of Uttar Pradesh through Chief Secretary
Case brief
What is this about?
An applicant challenged environmental clearance proceedings against an expired mining plan and site location within an active water channel. The Tribunal held the application premature as no final decision had been taken by SEIAA.
What did the court decide?
Application disposed of as premature with liberty to approach the Tribunal again if any cause of action arises.