NGT Southern Zone allowed the applicant's IA for condonation of delay in filing an appeal and posted the matter for final hearing. No substantive decision on merits has been rendered.
Condonation of delay application allowed; main appeal posted for final hearing on 02.02.2026.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Item No.01:
BEFORE THE NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL SOUTHERN ZONE, CHENNAI
[Through Physical Hearing (Hybrid Option)]
I.A. No.140 of 2025(SZ) in Appeal No.64 of 2025(SZ)
IN THE MATTER OF:
K. Selvaraj,
Kanniyakumari District.
… Applicant(s)/
Appellant (s)
Versus
SEIAA – Tamil Nadu,
Represented by its Member Secretary,
Chennai.
... Respondent(s)
Date of hearing: 25.11.2025.
CORAM :
HON’BLE Smt. JUSTICE PUSHPA SATHYANARAYANA, JUDICIAL MEMBER HON’BLE DR. PRASHANT GARGAVA, EXPERT MEMBER
For Applicant: M/s. V. Sukumar & A.Logesh. For Respondent: Mr. S. Sai Sathya Jith.
Page 1 of 2
ORDER
I.A. No.140 of 2025(SZ):
1. Heard the learned counsels.
2. There is a delay of 27 days in filing the appeal. Having satisfied with the reasons stated in the affidavit, the delay is condoned. Accordingly, the delay condonation application [I.A. No.140 of 2025(SZ)] is allowed.
Appeal No.64 of 2025(SZ):
4. Let notice be issued to the sole respondent through the Tribunal as well as privately.
5. The learned counsel Mr. S. Sai Sathya Jith accepts notice on behalf of the sole respondent viz., the SEIAA – Tamil Nadu and seeks time to file the reply.
6. Post the matter on 02.02.2026 for final hearing.
Sd/-
Smt. Justice Pushpa Sathyanarayana, JM
Sd/Dr. Prashant Gargava, EM
I.A. No.140/2025 (SZ) in Appeal No.64/2025(SZ) 25th November, 2025. AD.
Page 2 of 2
K. Selvaraj
SEIAA – Tamil Nadu
Puspa Sathyanarayana
Prashant Gargava
As recorded by the court registry
An application for interim relief made while the main matter is pending.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
