The applicant challenged the issuance of Consent to Operate to brick kilns by UPPCB, alleging violation of siting criteria. The Tribunal held no justification for suo-moto jurisdiction and rejected the application, noting an appeal would be the appropriate remedy.
Original Application No. 757/2024 rejected with liberty to avail remedies available in law.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. 2
Item No. 05
BEFORE THE NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL PRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHI
Original Application No. 757/2024
Jai Prakash Verma Applicant
Versus
State of U.P Respondent
Date of hearing: 05.08.2024
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR AGARWAL JUDICIAL MEMBER HON’BLE DR. AFROZ AHMAD, EXPERT MEMBER
Applicant: None Respondents: None
ORDER
1
Sudhir Agarwal, JM
Dr. Afroz Ahmad, EM
August 05, 2024 Original Application No. 757/2024 AB
2
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the original application under Sections 14 and 15 of the NGT Act has justification to be entertained given the availability of appeal against the impugned orders.
Whether the Tribunal should exercise suo-moto jurisdiction in the present matter.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Jai Prakash Verma
State of U.P
Sudhir Agarwal
Afroz Ahmad
As recorded by the court registry
An original application before a tribunal, most commonly a service dispute before the Central or a State Administrative Tribunal.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
