Anurag Sharma vs
Case brief
What is this about?
Application sought impleadment and challenged fly ash disposal/rendering of O.A. 725/2022 stayed for disposal of fly ash in low-lying areas to comply with environmental norms and notified guidelines.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. 2
Item No.07
BEFORE NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL PRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHI
Original Application No. 725/2022 (IA NO 598/2024)
Anurag Sharma Applicant
Versus
State of Uttar Pradesh & Anr.
Respondent(s)
Date of hearing: 22.11.2024
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR AGARWAL JUDICIAL MEMBER HON’BLE DR. AFROZ AHMAD, EXPERT MEMBER
Applicant: None Applicant in Person in I.A. No. 598 of 2024
Respondents: Mr. Gi. Gi. C. George (through VC) and Mr. Sunil Kumar, Advocates for State of U.P. Mr. Alok Agarwal, Mr. Sanjeev Kumar Singh, Mr. Devansh Shekhar and Mr. Shashwat Nath, Advocates for Respondent No. 2 LPGCL Mr. Naveen Kumar and Ms. Aprajita Bhardwaj, Advocate for MoEF and CC (through VC) Mr. Pradeep Misra and Mr. Daleep Dhyani, Advocates for UPPCB (through VC) Ms. Shaima Masood Proxy Counsel for Mr. Amit Singh Chauhan, Advocate for CPCB (through VC)
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether disposal of fly ash in low-lying areas reclamation violates EC conditions or Government notifications.
Whether project proponent has complied with statutory guidelines for ash utilization and disposal.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Anurag Sharma
- respondent
State of Uttar Pradesh
Coram
SUDHIR AGARWAL
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court