The National Green Tribunal disposed of an application concerning visarjan in the Yamuna River. The court held that the issue was already addressed in previous orders and by regulatory authorities, rendering no further direction necessary at this stage.
The application is disposed off with no further direction required at this stage.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Item No. 04
Court No. 1
BEFORE THE NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL PRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHI
Original Application No. 687/2024
Subhas Chandra
Applicant
Versus
Govt. of NCT of Delhi Respondent
Date of hearing: 09.08.2024
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAKASH SHRIVASTAVA, CHAIRPERSON HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN KUMAR TYAGI, JUDICIAL MEMBER HON’BLE DR. A. SENTHIL VEL, EXPERT MEMBER
Applicant: Mr. Mukesh Jain & Mr. Sachin, Representatives of Applicant
ORDER
1
Prakash Shrivastava, CP
Arun Kumar Tyagi, JM
Dr. A. Senthil Vel, EM
August 09, 2024 Original Application No. 687/2024 DV
2
3 issues framed by the court
Whether further directions are required regarding visarjan of pooja samgri in River Yamuna.
Whether the issue raised in the letter petition has already been considered and requisite directions issued.
Whether the original application requires further disposal given existing directions.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Subhas Chandra
Govt. of NCT of Delhi
Prakash Shrivastava
Arun Kumar Tyagi
A. Senthil Vel
As recorded by the court registry
An original application before a tribunal, most commonly a service dispute before the Central or a State Administrative Tribunal.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
