An application challenging a road construction plan in a wildlife sanctuary area was rendered infructuous because the contracting authority cancelled the tender allocation due to wildlife concerns before the hearing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Item No. 10
Court No. 2
BEFORE THE NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL PRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHI
Original Application No. 652/2022
R.D. Singh Bandral Applicant
Versus
Union of India & Ors. Respondent
Date of hearing: 31.05.2024
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR AGARWAL, JUDICIAL MEMBER HON’BLE DR. AFROZ AHMAD, EXPERT MEMBER
Applicant: Applicant in Person (through VC)
Respondents: Mr. Jitendra Bharti Advocate for MoEF & CC (through VC) Mr. G M Kawoosa, Advocate for UT of J & K (through VC)
ORDER
1
Sudhir Agarwal, JM
Dr. Afroz Ahmad, EM
May 31, 2024 O.A. No. 652/2022 A
2
R.D. Singh Bandral
Union of India
Sudhir Agarwal
Afroz Ahmad
As recorded by the court registry
An original application before a tribunal, most commonly a service dispute before the Central or a State Administrative Tribunal.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
