The court disposed of this original application after hearing the respondent in the absence of the applicant. Finding no further cause of action as the alleged obstruction was removed and the wall was on private land, the application was set aside.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
(Pune Bench)
Item No.7
BEFORE THE NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL WESTERN ZONE BENCH, PUNE
THROUGH PHYSICAL HEARING (WITH HYBRID OPTION)
Original Application No.130/2023(WZ) Earlier L.P. No.05/2023(WZ)
Trimurti Niwruthi Pangare
…..Applicant
Versus
Dist. Collector, Pune
….Respondent
Date of hearing: 09.08.2024
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH, JUDICIAL MEMBER HON’BLE DR. VIJAY KULKARNI, EXPERT MEMBER
Applicant : None appeared Respondent : Mrs. Swati Pandit, Advocate along-with Shri Nasan, Tahsildar and Shri Kharat, SDO, Bhor,
ORDER
Page 1 of 6
“
Page 2 of 6
Page 3 of 6
Page 4 of 6
”
Page 5 of 6
Dinesh Kumar Singh, JM
Dr. Vijay Kulkarni, EM
August 09, 2024 Original Application No.130/2023(WZ) Earlier L.P. No.05/2023(WZ) P.Kr
Page 6 of 6
1 issue framed by the court
Whether any cause of action survives in the application given the Respondent's report that the water flow is undisturbed.
Trimurti Niwruthi Pangare
Dist. Collector, Pune
Dinesh Kumar Singh
Vijay Kulkarni
As recorded by the court registry
An original application before a tribunal, most commonly a service dispute before the Central or a State Administrative Tribunal.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
