The National Green Tribunal Central Zone Bench disposed of an application challenging an e-auction advertisement because the Draft Scoping Report was properly prepared and approved by the SEIAA, rendering the challenge unmaintainable as an alternative remedy existed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Item No. 02
BEFORE THE NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL CENTRAL ZONE BENCH, BHOPAL (Through Video Conferencing)
Original Application No. 118/2024(CZ) (I.A. No. 46/2024) (I.A. No. 47/2024)
Dastak – Face the Truth
Applicant(s)
Vs.
State of Rajasthan & Ors.
Respondent(s)
Date of Hearing: 08.07.2024
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SHEO KUMAR SINGH, JUDICIAL MEMBER HON'BLE DR. AFROZ AHMAD, EXPERT MEMBER
For Applicant(s): Ms. Diksha Chaturvedi, Adv. For Respondent(s) : None.
ORDER
Sheo Kumar Singh, JM
Dr. Afroz Ahmad, EM
08th July, 2024 O.A No. 118/2024(CZ) PN
1
OA No. 118/2024(CZ)
Dastak – Face the Truth Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors.
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the original application challenging the e-auction advertisement on the grounds of unprepared or unapproved Draft Scoping Report is maintainable.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Dastak – Face the Truth
State of Rajasthan
Sheo Kumar Singh
Dr. Afroz Ahmad
As recorded by the court registry
An original application before a tribunal, most commonly a service dispute before the Central or a State Administrative Tribunal.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
